The world’s most watched sporting event may soon face its greatest opponent yet: climate change. As global temperatures continue to rise, FIFA is quietly considering a significant reshuffling of its iconic World Cup calendar—a move that would ripple through the sports world and beyond.
When Qatar hosted the 2022 World Cup, the unprecedented shift to November-December instead of the traditional summer schedule wasn’t merely a one-off accommodation. It was perhaps our first glimpse at how climate change will transform global sports scheduling for decades to come.
“We’re entering uncharted territory,” explains Dr. Marta Sanchez, climate scientist at the University of Barcelona. “The combination of rising temperatures and humidity in many traditional host regions is creating conditions where elite athletic performance becomes not just difficult, but potentially dangerous.”
FIFA’s medical committee has been analyzing heat stress data from recent tournaments, with alarming results. During midday matches in several potential 2030 host cities, wet-bulb temperatures—which measure heat stress on the human body—could regularly exceed safety thresholds for high-intensity athletic activity. Players already pushing their bodies to the limit would face significant health risks, from heat exhaustion to more serious conditions.
The economics of this shift would be staggering. Broadcasting rights for the World Cup are typically negotiated years in advance, with summer scheduling allowing networks to capitalize on reduced competition from other major sporting events. A permanent move to winter months would force television networks to navigate crowded broadcasting calendars and potentially reduce advertising revenue.
Club teams, particularly from Europe’s elite leagues, have already voiced strong opposition. “The football calendar is already compressed to breaking point,” noted Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola at a recent press conference. “Adding further disruption would put impossible demands on players’ bodies and minds.”
Beyond the pitch, host nations face mounting challenges. The massive infrastructure investments required for World Cup hosting—stadiums, transportation networks, and accommodation—must now incorporate additional climate resilience measures. Cooling technologies alone added an estimated $700 million to Qatar’s World Cup budget, according to climate economists.
FIFA’s sustainability team has been quietly developing contingency models for future tournaments. Internal documents suggest three potential paths forward: permanently shifting the tournament to winter months (November-December), creating regional rotation systems based on seasonal climate suitability, or investing in technological solutions like fully climate-controlled stadiums.
The fan experience, too, stands to change dramatically. The tradition of outdoor viewing parties and festival atmospheres that define World Cup culture could fade as extreme heat makes such gatherings impractical or dangerous in many regions. The communal joy of watching matches in city squares might give way to indoor, air-conditioned viewing experiences—altering the very social fabric that makes the tournament special.
“Sports schedules have always been shaped by weather—but this is different,” explains sports historian Professor James Wilson. “We’re witnessing the beginning of a fundamental restructuring of global sports calendars in response to climate change. The World Cup is just the highest-profile example.”
For FIFA President Gianni Infantino, this represents both crisis and opportunity. The organization could position itself as a climate leader, using its global platform to highlight climate impacts while demonstrating adaptive strategies. Alternatively, FIFA risks being seen as reactive and unprepared if it fails to develop coherent climate resilience plans.
The situation raises profound questions about sporting traditions in a warming world. How much can a tournament change before it loses its essential character? What responsibility do sports governing bodies have to address climate concerns? And perhaps most importantly, can the beautiful game help illuminate climate challenges for billions of fans worldwide?
As the planet warms, the World Cup—like so many other aspects of human culture—must adapt or risk becoming unsustainable. The decisions FIFA makes in the coming years will reveal much about how we balance tradition with the inescapable realities of our changing climate.
For more perspectives on how climate change is reshaping cultural institutions, visit CO24 Culture and CO24 Trends, or share your thoughts at CO24 Opinions.
