Lululemon’s stock plummeted 10% in pre-market trading Friday after the athletic apparel giant slashed its annual forecast, citing significant headwinds from newly imposed US tariffs on Chinese imports. The Vancouver-based company’s unexpected announcement sent shockwaves through the retail sector, highlighting the far-reaching implications of trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies.
“The reimposition of Section 301 tariffs on certain categories of goods imported from China will impact our business in fiscal 2024,” explained Calvin McDonald, Lululemon’s CEO, during an earnings call that quickly turned from celebration to caution. Despite reporting solid first-quarter results with a 10% revenue increase to $2.2 billion, the tariff situation forced the company to temper expectations.
Lululemon now forecasts annual revenue between $10.7 billion and $10.8 billion, down from its previous outlook of $10.7 billion to $10.9 billion. The company also reduced its earnings projection to between $13.10 and $13.40 per share, compared to the earlier $14.00 to $14.20 range—a significant downward adjustment that spooked investors.
The tariffs, reinstituted by President Biden’s administration on June 12, impose a 25% duty on various Chinese imports including apparel and footwear. For Lululemon, which manufactures approximately 40% of its products in China, this represents a substantial operational challenge. While the company has been diversifying its supply chain in recent years, pivoting manufacturing operations isn’t something that happens overnight.
“We’ve been actively working to mitigate these impacts through our pricing strategies and supply chain optimizations,” McDonald added, “but the immediacy of these tariff changes requires us to update our guidance to reflect current market realities.”
The situation has broader implications for the athletic apparel industry. Competitors like Nike and Under Armour, which also maintain significant manufacturing presences in China, saw their stocks dip in sympathy, though to a lesser extent. Industry analysts believe companies with more diversified production bases may weather the storm more effectively.
Market experts are closely watching Lululemon’s next moves. Neil Saunders, managing director at GlobalData Retail, noted: “Lululemon has built its reputation on premium pricing justified by quality. The question now becomes whether they absorb the tariff costs to maintain market share or pass them to consumers, potentially risking volume.”
The company’s response strategy includes accelerated diversification of its manufacturing footprint across Vietnam, Cambodia, and Bangladesh, along with selective price adjustments on certain product categories. However, management stressed that maintaining product quality remains non-negotiable, even amid cost pressures.
Despite current challenges, Lululemon continues to expand its global footprint, opening 8 new stores in the first quarter and planning 35-40 more this year. The company’s direct-to-consumer sales, which represent 42% of total revenue, grew by 7% year-over-year, suggesting strong brand loyalty even as economic pressures mount.
Will consumers remain willing to pay premium prices for their favorite athleisure brand as costs potentially rise? That question looms large as Lululemon navigates these turbulent trade waters while trying to maintain its position as a leader in the competitive athletic apparel market.
For more business insights and breaking retail news, visit CO24 Business and CO24 Breaking News.
